PackCCP が SteamOne 向けに紙ベースの輸送用パッケージを設計した方法

フランスの衣類ケア用品ブランドの持続可能なパッケージング

Large garment steamer with multiple accessories created a packaging problem that could not be solved by simply adding more cushioning. PackCCP redesigned the internal protection around movement, contact points, and vulnerable surfaces, using paper-based structures that ultimately passed the client’s own machine factory test.

プロジェクトのスナップショット

お客様：

Garment Care Appliance Brand

市場：

France

業界：

Garment Care & Home Appliances

製品：

Large Garment Steamer with Accessories

包装形態：

Protective Transport Packaging System

カスタマイズ：

Machine Restraint, Accessory Zoning, Pressure-Point Control

材料 & 仕上げる：

Engineered Paper-Based Protective Components

リードタイム：

Timely Delivery

コンサルタント：

アイリーン

<span class ="tr_" id="tr_18" data-source="" data-srclang="zh-cn" data-orig="Table of Contents Sidebar">Table of Contents Sidebar</span>

00 プロジェクト概要

The brief was not to make a stronger outer box. The real task was to stop a large machine and several accessories from becoming moving objects inside the package during transport. PackCCP therefore treated the project as a protective packaging engineering problem, mapping vulnerable surfaces, safe load-bearing areas, accessory contact risks, and unpacking requirements before developing the paper-based internal structure

01 課題

The Machine Could Move Without Looking Loose

Large appliance may appear secure while standing still, yet vibration, tilting, and repeated handling can gradually shift the product inside the pack. Even small movement could create rubbing, pressure marks, or concentrated impact on finished surfaces.

Accessories Could Become the Real Damage Source

The main machine was not the only concern. Hard or heavy accessories could shift independently, strike the appliance body, rub against cosmetic surfaces, or damage one another if they were not individually controlled.

Paper Had to Perform Structural Work

The sustainability requirement ruled out simply filling the package with conventional plastic cushioning. Paper-based components had to do more than occupy space—they needed to carry load, restrict movement, separate components, and remain practical to assemble and unpack.

02 当社のソリューション

Instead of filling empty space, we designed the pack around where movement had to stop and where contact had to be avoided.

Positioning the Machine Before Designing the Rest

The engineering team first determined how the garment steamer should sit inside the package and which areas could safely carry pressure. Supports were then positioned around those zones, while visible or sensitive surfaces were deliberately kept away from unnecessary contact. Only after the machine position was stable did we begin arranging the accessories around it.

Turning Accessories Into Fixed Zones

Each accessory was evaluated according to weight, 形, and its potential to move during transport. Components that could safely share space were grouped; others received dedicated paper-based sections to prevent rubbing or impact. The goal was not visual neatness, but to ensure that no loose part could gain momentum inside the pack.

Comparing Structural Logic, Not Just Sample Appearance

Several internal layouts were developed because no single concept was assumed to be correct from the beginning. One restrained the product better but used more material; another assembled more easily but allowed excess movement. Repeated packing, repositioning, clearance checks, and unpacking trials helped refine the final structure before it was sent for customer-side testing.

03 プロジェクトの実行方法

ステージ

私たちがやったこと

なぜそれが重要なのか

Map the Risk

何

Examined the complete machine and every accessory, identifying vulnerable surfaces, protruding parts, safe pressure areas, possible contact points, and unpacking requirements.

なぜ

Turned the project from a dimension-based box design into a movement-and-contact analysis.

Build from the Machine Outward

何

Fixed the machine position first, then developed supports, clearances, and accessory zones around it using paper-based structural components.

なぜ

Prevented accessory layout or empty space from dictating an unsuitable machine position.

Challenge the Structure

何

Repeatedly packed, 傾いた, repositioned, and unpacked the system, revising supports and compartments wherever movement or difficult removal remained.

なぜ

Exposed weaknesses internally before the client committed time to its own factory test.

Release for Factory Validation

何

Submitted the refined packaging configuration to the client’s machine factory after internal simulation and remote review through photos and videos.

なぜ

The final configuration passed the client’s own factory test and moved forward to order.

04 結果 & クライアントの価値

Engineered to Pass the Client’s Own Test

Machine Movement Controlled Through Product-Specific Support Points
Accessories Assigned Fixed Zones Away From Vulnerable Surfaces
Paper-Based Protection Replaced the Need for Conventional Plastic Cushioning
Final Structure Passed the Client’s Machine Factory Test and Entered Order

The decisive result was not that the sample looked correct—it was that the complete packaging system performed successfully under the client’s own machine factory test conditions.